So
about time welfare stopped making it better off to be on benefits than
in a job, when I was a kid benefits were just enough and no more to live
on a tight budget and no luxuries...
I know I'm complete
scum, being single & childless and therefore utterly worthless in
the eyes of the DWP, but 65 quid a week doesn't get you very far &
certainly doesn't cover luxuries.
I left it a year before signing on, living off my huge savings (all 3
grand of it) & trying to make a living selling my sparkly stuff, but
my creditors demanded I prove to them I wasn't entitled to JSA &
the only way I could do that was to sign on.
So I now get an income of £65ish a week, either from my sales, in JSA or
now, from my part time job. The DWP assess my income on an 8 week
average and top me up so I get the £65.
I own my house, so there's no housing benefit available, but the
mortgage company still want paying (I pay them £140 a month)... I'm
living the life of Reilly me!
I've just had my boiler replaced after 14 months without heating/hot
water... and had to go begging to my parents to finance it.
Technically though, I suppose you're right - I would be "better off" without bothering to go out to work (either for myself or at my new part time job), as I'm still only on a maximum of £65 a week, whether I shell out on petrol to get to work or whether I fester indoors
If I could find full time work though, I'd definitely be better off working, so I think it's a bit of an urban myth. Could be different if you're on housing benefit & various dependents' allowances I suppose?