Have the police done this every year?
I
seem to have read that they wanted the council to not issue a 10 year
permit. But if they haven't done this since the outset, isn't there
just a chance it's just a case of hot air.
Generally speaking, the safety/security record during over 2 decades that the Bash has been running has been excellent.
Following Gentleman Gerry's death in 2007, when he was shot and killed on his way home from the Bash, understandably, the Police wanted to step up security, and indeed opposed last year's licence application. The authorities in Warwickshire in turn, granted the permit/licensing for the event for a period of 10 years.
It brings in a LOT of trade for local businesses, so they don't want to see it go.
At the time of 2008's Bash, the trial of those charged with Gerry's murder was pending and certain intelligence-based concerns were raised by the Police. This is all quite understandable, generally speaking. They'd like to avoid any possible revenge/retribution action.
What I don't understand however, is Mr Holland's insistence that there is a "clear, evidenced and significant risk to innocent members of the public". not quoted in the OP of this discussion, but he is quoted as saying that by the Beeb. I would very much like to see this "evidenced risk" for myself.
So far as my understanding goes, the incidence of criminal activity affecting public safety at this event is pretty low e.g. assaults, sexual assaults, theft, muggings etc etc.
When you get a crowd of some 50,000 people together, not every last one of them is going to be a fluffy, cuddly, individual who makes daisy chains and generally spreads the lurve... but personally speaking, I reckon I'd be safer going to the Bully than to say, a Spurs v. Arsenal footie match, or Glastonbury, or an Anti-Capitalist demo. Can we have all these banned too if the Bulldog's banned?
Ultimately, a Police cordon around the event itself, stopping & searching nearby and all the rest of it wouldn't have saved Gerry's life. He was attacked miles away from the event.
I just can't see that blocking the licence application and cancelling the event would have any positive effect whatsoever. The local businesses would potentially lose hundreds of thousands of £££ worth of trade.
So they would alienate not just the members of the HAMC and anyone who enjoys going to the Bulldog (Club or otherwise) but also the local businesses who have come to rely on a very busy weekend's trading, thanks to the Bash.
And it could potentially open up a trickle down effect to smaller rallies/events, where local councils/Police could raise objections to granting licences, holding up the Bulldog as their precedent.
Here endeth another Wannabe essay... After I swore I wouldn't get involved... At the end of the day, I know naff all about the *real* reasons behind Mr Holland's objections, I only know what I've read/heard, 90% of which is probably pure bolleaux anyway! As usual
& part of me can't help but think that he's using it as a platform for his personal advancement, making it into a bit of a crusade to "make his mark".