No Sandi, much though we'd like to believe these tales, they simply aren't true.
The reason for the use of grey surface dressing over other means is purely cost. Allow me to expand lol ....
Typical costs for the resurfacing of a 100m length of rural road;
Surface Dressing - spray of emulsion bituminous binder onto existing surface followed immediately by even layer of aggregate chippings.
Approx £1.50/sqm, total cost approx £1,125
Carriageway overlay - milling to 40mm along edges of existing carriageway, spray of emulsion bituminous binder onto prepared surface and resurface with 40mm hot rolled asphalt with applied precoated chippings.
Approx £12/sqm, total cost approx £9,000
Partial reconstruction - milling of minimum depth of 40mm across entire surface with localised additional excavation of up to 250mm, spray of emulsion bituminous binder onto prepared surface, binder course regulating using Dense Bitumen Macadam with 20mm nominal size aggregate and resurface with 40mm hot rolled asphalt with applied precoated chippings.
Approx £35-£60/sqm, total cost between £26,250 and £45,000
Last year North Yorkshire CC had a budget of roughly £56M for highway maintenance. If all of this was spent on resurfacing, then the following quantities of road could have been dealt with according to method;
Surface Dressing - approx 5000km
Carriageway Overlay - approx 600km
Partial Reconstruction - between 125 and 210km
We all hate "surface dressing" and in particular the left over chippings which again for cost reasons are left to be brushed into the undergrowth by traffic, but until someone invents another quick, cheap and reliable method for resurfacing our roads, it's here to stay I'm afraid